← Back to Blog & Updates

Anchoring on Polygon: Security & Costs

Why we separate cost, reliability, and integrity when anchoring—and how we structure it for verifiable proofs.

Note: This post is for technical and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or regulatory advice.

What does “anchoring” mean in Certifylize?

In Certifylize, anchoring means: we can anchor cryptographic checksums (hashes) and technical references so that later consistency checks are possible. This does not automatically mean “documents are written to the blockchain”. Instead, the ledger acts as a timestamp/reference layer to make tampering harder and audit paths more traceable.

Costs: gas, batching, and predictable usage

Public blockchains require transaction fees (“gas”). Fees can fluctuate. For stable operations, it matters how anchors are created, batched, and triggered. In practice, we use clear triggers (e.g., when a certificate is finalized) and avoid unnecessary on-chain actions. The goal: verifiable proofs with a more predictable cost structure.

Security: what the ledger can do—and what it can’t

Anchoring improves traceability because later changes can become detectable (via hash/reference comparisons). However, it is not an absolute security guarantee and does not replace organizational controls. Strong security is multi-layered: access control, roles/permissions, logging and abuse prevention, secure secret handling, and clear responsibilities for customer-provided content.

Operations: verification should work without hype

Verification should be practical: open a link/QR, see the status and verification details, and—depending on setup—check technical references. The key is clear separation: Certifylize provides technical verifiability and integrity signals; whether a certificate is “valid” in substance depends on the issuer’s process and data.

Key takeaways

  • Anchoring = hashes/references, not “documents on-chain”.
  • Costs come from gas; triggers/batching help keep it predictable.
  • Anchors support integrity, but don’t replace security/compliance processes.
  • Practical focus: simple verification (link/QR) and traceable audit paths.

Whitepaper: /en/whitepaper
Security & Privacy: /en/security